CRITICAL ENTERPRISE SOFTWARE CONTRACTING ISSUES: RIGHTS, ASSURANCES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Jacques Verville, Ned Kock, Nazim Taskin

Resumo


Unfavorable contractual agreement can be detrimental to the well-being of an organization. Often software contracts are written to favor the vendor and their terminology is vague and in a high-level language that can make organizations vulnerable. Among all IT applications, Enterprise Software is particularly critical due to integrating various critical business processes. In addition, ES implementations are among the most expensive types of IT implementations. Thus, ES contracting mistakes can be particularly costly for organizations.

Palavras-chave


contractos, aplicações de tecnologia de informacao, negócios

Referências


DISBROW, J. B. How to make software contract negotiations work for your business. Gartner, Inc., report number G00126089, dated the 22nd February, 2005.

FINK, A. The survey handbook. 2. ed. SAGE, 2002.

FINK, A. How to conduct surveys: a step by step guide. 4. ed. SAGE, 2008.

FORNELL, C.; LARCKER, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, v. 18, n. 1, p. 39-50, 1981. doi: 10.2307/3151312

GILBERT, D. R. The twilight of corporate strategy: a comparative ethical critique. Oxford University Press, New York: NY, 1992.

GIFFORD, S. Limited attention and the optimal incompleteness of contracts. Journal of Law Economics and Organizations, v. 15, n. 2, p. 468 486, 1999.

HAIR, J.; BLACK, W.; BABIN, B.; ANDERSON, R.; TATHAM, R. Multivariate data analysis, 6. ed., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2006.

HARRIS, R. Customization versus standardization: striking a balance in ERP software. Machine Design, v. 72, n. 14, p. S64-S69, 2000.

HOFFMAN, P. S. The software legal book, Croton-on-Hudson, NY: Shafer Books, 1992.

KOCK, N.; VERVILLE, J. Enterprise systems contracting: developing and testing a model of divergent approaches in the service and manufacturing sectors. International Journal of Management Practice, v. 2, n. 2, p. 127 143, 2006.

MILGROM, P.; ROBERTS, J. Economics, organization and management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1992.

NUNNALY, J. Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw Hill, 1978.

RICHMOND, W. B.; SEIDMANN, A.; WHINSTON, A. B. Incomplete contracting issues in information systems development outsourcing. Decision Support Systems, v. 8, n. 5, p. 459-477, 1992. doi:10.1016/0167-9236(92)90029-O

SALANT, P.; DILLMAN, D. A. How to conduct your own survey. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1994.

SALBU, S. R. Evolving contract as a device for flexible coordination and control. American Business Law Journal, v. 34, n. 3, p. 329-384, 1997. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1714.1997.tb00898.x

SHANKLAND, S. SCO suits target two big Linux users. CNET News.Com, 2004. Available at: http://www.zdnetasia.com/news/business/0,39044229, 39170786,00.htm. Access: May/2011.

SMITH, E. E. Understanding dynamic obligations: arms control agreement. Southern California Law Review, v. 64, n. 1, p. 1549-1587, 1991.

VERVILLE, J. An empirical study of organizational buying behavior: a critical investigation of the acquisition of ERP software, 2000. Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Administrative Science, University Laval, Quebec, Canada.

VERVILLE, J.; HALINGTEN, A. Acquiring enterprise software: beating the vendors at their own game. Prentice-Hall (PTR), NJ, 2001.

WILLIAMSON, O. Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. New York, NY: Free Press, 1975.


Texto completo: PDF (English) PDF

Licença Creative Commons
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 .