Discourse analysis and its uses in organizational studies: a study of quotation contexts of Phillips, Lawrence e Hardy (2004) [doi: 10.21529/RECADM.2016004]

Samir Adamoglu de Oliveira, Luciana Godri, Mayla Cristina Costa, Edson Ronaldo Guarido Filho
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21529/RECADM.2016004

Abstract

This work has as goal to evaluate how the paper of Phillips, Lawrence and Hardy (2004) and their discourse analysis model has been appropriated in the Organizational Studies field. Using a bibliometric measure of quoters and the qualitative analysis of quotation context, this paper describes: (i) the way it was applied empirically in researches, (ii) to what study objects it was applied, (iii) in which thematic areas it was used, and (iv) its repercussion among different theoretical slopes that have used the analytical model. As it was one of the first works to consider the possibility of a discourse analysis within the organizational studies using institutionalism, after 10 years of the publication, the results show perennial as a meta-theoretical base to discuss the theme. Considering those, the present paper proposes a theoretical-methodological model to conduct future discussions about the discourse role in the (re)production of institutional web.


Keywords

Discourse analysis; Discourse; Institutions; Quotation contexts

Compartilhe

References


Astley, W. G. (1985). Administrative Science As Socially Constructed Truth. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(4), 497-513.

Bardin, L. (2010). Análise de Conteúdo (4 Ed.). Lisboa: Edições 70.

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (2003). A Construção Social da Realidade: tratado de sociologia do conhecimento. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes.

Bishaw, S. B. (2008). Instituti Institutional strategies towards improving health information systems (HIS) in Sub-Saharan Africa, 282, 191–207.

Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32.

Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (2010). Travels of Ideas. In Translating Organizational Change (Vol. 13, pp. 13–48). Berlin.

Erikson, M. G., & Erlandson, P. (2014). A taxonomy of motives to cite. Social Studies of Science, 44(4), 625–637.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Discurso e Mudança Social. Brasília: Editora da UnB.

Flick, U. (2009). Qualidade na Pesquisa Qualitativa. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317-371.

Khaire, M., & Wadhwani, R. D. (2010). Changing Landscapes : The Construction of Meaning and Value in a New Market Category — Modern Indian Art. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1281–1304.

Lammers, J. C., & Garcia, M. A. (2014). Institutional Theory. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Orgs.). The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: advances in theory, research, and methods (3 Ed.) (pp. 195–216). London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Lok, J., & Willmott, H. (2006). Dialogue – Institutional theory, language and discourse analysis: a comment on Phillips, Lawrence and Hardy. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 477-480.

Liu, S., Chen, C., Ding, K., Wang, B., Xu, K., & Lin, Y. (2014). Literature retrieval based on citation context. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1293–1307.

Merton, R. K. (1996). On social science and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Micelotta, E. R., & Washington, M. (2013). Institutions and Maintenance: The Repair Work of Italian Professions. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1137–1170.

Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635-652.

Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2006) Dialogue – Discussing "Discourse and institutions": a reply to Lok and Willmott. Academy Management Review, 31(2), 480-483.

Phillips, N., & Malhotra, N. (2008). Taking social construction seriously: Extending the discursive approach in institutional theory. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Salin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 702–720). London: Sage.

Phillips, N., & Oswick, C. (2012). Organizational Discourse: Domains, Debates, and Directions. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 435–481.

QSR International (2011). NVivo Pro. Version 9.2: QSR International Pty Ltd. 1 CD-ROM.

Ribeiro Palacios, M., Huber-Sannwald, E., García Barrios, L., Peña de Paz, F., Carrera Hernández, J., & Galindo Mendoza, M. D. G. (2013). Landscape diversity in a rural territory: Emerging land use mosaics coupled to livelihood diversification. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 814–824.

Seal, W. (2010). Managerial discourse and the link between theory and practice: From ROI to value-based management. Management Accounting Research, 21(2), 95–109.

Sidani, Y., & Showail, S. (2013). Religious discourse and organizational change: Legitimizing the stakeholder perspective at a Saudi conglomerate. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(6), 931–947.

Silverman, D. (2009). Interpretação de dados qualitativos: métodos para análise de entrevistas, textos e interações (3 Ed.). Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Stassen, K. R., Gislason, M., & Leroy, P. (2010). Impact of environmental discourses on public health policy arrangements: a comparative study in the UK and Flanders, (Belgium). Public Health, 124(10), 581–92.

Vaast, E., Davidson, E. J., & Mattson, T. (2013). Talking About Technology: The Emergence of a New Actor Category Through New Media. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1069–1092.

Zilber, T. B. (2011). Institutional Multiplicity in Practice : A Tale of Two High-Tech Conferences in Israel. Organization Science, 22(6), 1539–1559.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.