Editorial: Formulating hypotheses transparently after results

Luciano Rossoni
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21529/RECADM.2021ed3

Keywords

hypotheses; HARKing; Sharking; Tharking; p-hacking

Compartilhe

References


Feyerabend, P. K. (1989). Contra o método (Vol. 3). Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves.

Hollenbeck, J. R., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Harking, sharking, and tharking: making the case for post hoc analysis of scientific data. Journal of Management, 43(1), 5-18.

Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015). The extent and consequences of p-hacking in science. PLoS Biology, 13(3), e1002106.

Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196-217.

Strang, D., & Siler, K. (2015). Revising as reframing: original submissions versus published papers in Administrative Science Quarterly, 2005 to 2009. Sociological Theory, 33(1), 71-96.

Watts, D. J. (2015). Tudo é óbvio: desde que você saiba a resposta. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Paz e Terra.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.