Organizing change: the hospital management of childbirth as practice

Ana Carolina Júlio, César Tureta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21529/RECADM.2023003

Abstract

This work aims to understand the maintenance-change process of hospital childbirth management. We used the Schatzki’s practice onto-epistemology, and we conducted a Practice Based Study in a public maternity hospital. Data were gathered from observations, interviews, and documentary research. Rather than a medical-hospital event, hospital childbirth management is a socialmaterial practice that overlapped other practices (maternal, medical and health management practices) and is constructed by the interactions between humans and no humans. We argue that the maintenance-change of hospital childbirth management is interdependent: there is the dissolution of certain activities and material arrangements, while other organizational elements remain unchanged. Our contribution is the analysis of the “maintenance-change” of practices as a single, simultaneous and recursive process. This evidence that practices are dynamic, and that change is a constitutive element of organizational/social life. In practical terms, this work can contribute to the formulation of public health policies and to a hospital childbirth management organized around a new logic (beyond medical technique). This has the potential to reduce the rate of unnecessary cesarean sections and, consequently, the costs of maternity hospitals and health system, and to advance the debate about hospital management, its actors and practices.


Keywords

social practices; organizational change; organizing; hospital management; childbirth


Compartilhe


References


Betran AP, Ye J, Moller A, et al. (2021). Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Global Health, 6:e005671.

Bojorquez, I., Rosales, C., Angulo, A., de Zapien, J., Denman, C., & Madanat, H. (2018). International migration and dietary change in Mexican women from a social practice framework. Appetite, 125, 72-80.

Brasil (2005). Presidência da República. Lei do Acompanhante. Recuperado em 01 março, 2019, de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2004-2006/2005/Lei/L11108 .htm.

Brasil (2011). Ministério da Saúde. Rede cegonha. Recuperado em 01 fevereiro, 2019, de http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/gm/2011/prt1459_24_06_2011.html

Brasil (2016). Agência Nacional de Saúde. Projeto parto adequado. Recuperado em 01 março, 2019, de http://www.ans.gov.br/images/stories/Materiaisparapesquisa/Mate riaisporassunto/webtotalpartoadequado.pdf

Brasil. (2021). Ministério da Saúde. Sinasc: Sistema de informações sobre nascidos vivos. Recuperado em 15 novembro, 2021, de http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/deftohtm.exe?sinasc/cnv/nvuf.def

Corbin. J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1),3-21.

Cucchi, C., Lubberink, R., Dentoni, D., & Gartner, W. B. (2022). ‘That’s Witchcraft’: Community entrepreneuring as a process of navigating intra-community tensions through spiritual practices. Organization Studies, 43(2) 179–201.

Fernandes, T. A., Silva, A. R. L., & Machado, F. C. L. (2021). A organização da prática dos roteiros turísticos no turismo receptivo.

Cad. EBAPE.BR, 19(4), 842-857.

Georges, E., & Davis-Floyd, R. (2016). Humanistic obstetrics in Brazil. In L. Manderson, E. Cartwright & A. Hardon (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Medical Anthropology. Routledge.

Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15-31.

Hui, A., Schatzki, T., & Shove, E. (2016). The nexus of practices: connections, constellations, practitioners. Routledge.

Júlio, A. C. (2017). Mudança de práticas: o fazer obstétrico na Grande Vitória/ES. Teoria e Prática em Administração, 7(2),128-155.

Júlio, A. C., & Tureta, C. (2018). " Transformando lixo em luxo": a materialidade nas práticas da produção carnavalesca. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 15, 427-443.

Júlio, A. C., & Fantinel, L. (2021). A produção da pandemia de covid-19 e as relações organizadas entre humanos e outros modos de existência. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Organizacionais, 8(2), 437-456.

Loscher, G., Splitter, V., & Seidl, D. (2019). Theodor Schatzki's theory and its implications for Organization Studies. In Clegg, S. and Cunha, M. P. (Eds.). Management, Organizations and Contemporary Social Theory. London: Routledge.

Moura, E. O. D., & Bispo, M. D. S. (2021). Compreendendo a prática da gestão escolar pela perspectiva da sociomaterialidade. Organizações & Sociedade, 28, 135-163.

Nicolini, D. (2009). Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization studies, 30(12),1391-1418.

Nicolini, D. (2010). Medical innovation as a process of translation: a case from the field of telemedicine. British Journal of Management, 21(4),1011-1026.

Nicolini, D. (2013). Practice theory, work, & organization: an introduction. Oxford University Press.

Nicolini, D. (2016). Is small the only beautiful? Making sense of ‘large phenomena’ from a practice- based perspective. In A. Hui, T. Schatzki, & E. Shove (Eds.), The nexus of practices: connections, constellations, practitioners, 98-113. Londres: Routledge.

Niemelä, R., Pikkarainen, M., Ervasti, M., & Reponen, J. (2019). The change of pediatric surgery practice due to the emergence of connected health technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 352-365.

Organização Mundial da Saúde. (2015). Declaração da OMS sobre taxas de cesáreas.

Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243-263.

Reischauer, G., & Ringel, L. (2022). Unmanaged transparency in a digital society: swiss army knife or double-edged sword? Organization Studies, OnlineFirst, 1–28.

Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1),85–109.

Schatzki, T. R. (2002). The site of the social: a philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. Pennsylvania State University.

Schatzki, T. R. (2005). The sites of organizations. Organization studies. 26(3),465-484.

Schatzki, T. R. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization studies, 27(12),1863-1873.

Schatzki, T. R. (2012). A primer on practices: theory and research. In J. Higgs, R. Barnett, S. Billett, M. Hutchings & F. Trede (Eds). Practice-Based Education: Perspectives and Strategies. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Schatzki, T. (2013). The edge of change: on the emergence, persistence, and dissolution of practices. In E. Shove & N. Spurling (Eds). Sustainable Practices: Social Theory and Climate Change. London, Routledge.

Schatzki, T. (2016). Crises and adjustments in ongoing life. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 41(1),17-33.

Schatzki, T., Knorr-Cetina, K., & Von Savigny, E. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.

Thompson, N. A., & Byrne, O. (2022). Imagining futures: theorizing the practical knowledge of future-making. Organization Studies, 43(2) 247–268.

WHO - World Health Organization. (2018). Maternal, newborn, child, and adolescent health. Recuperado em 02 abril, 2021, de https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/about/en/

Wenzel, M., Krämer, H., Koch, J., & Reckwitz, A. (2020). Future and organization studies: on the rediscovery of a problematic temporal category in organizations. Organization Studies, 41(10) 1441–1455.

Yakhlef, A., & Essén, A. (2013). Practice innovation as bodily skills: the example of elderly home care service delivery. Organization, 20(6),881-903.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.