The situated institutionalization of the Industrial and Technological Pole in Health of Eusébio, Ceará

Bruna Gonçalves de Oliveira Freire, Ana Silvia Rocha Ipiranga
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21529/RECADM.2023010

Abstract

Recently, in institutional theory, the question of the spatial-temporal dynamics of institutional processes and their influence on delimited territories has been recognized. Based on the concept of situated institutionalism, this study problematized the case of the Industrial and Technological Health Pole (Polo Industrial e Tecnológico de Saúde - PITS), located in the city of Eusébio. The objective of the article was to understand the process of institutionalism of the PITS. Having as a guiding question: does the institutionalism process of the PITS located in the city of Eusébio occur in a situated way? The methodology was based on the qualitative case study strategy. Document research was carried out with material surveys and the constitution of a research collection. For the analysis, the "documentary clues" were selected in order to establish connections, comparisons and to constitute significant configurations between the relevant elements and dimensions of the documentary texts with the objective of the research. On the one hand, the results showed that, in this implementation phase, the process of institutionalism of the PITS was guided more by the traditional model of regional policies; and less for the organization of institutional practices situated in the sense of mobilizing a network of actors that connect people, daily life and organizations between different places, both in the city of Eusébio and in the neighboring city, Fortaleza. However, and in the case of PITS, this conception of organization in allusion to space established a level of analysis that will allow the consideration and deepening of these microsocial processes in future studies.


Keywords

situated institutionalism; Industrial and Technological Pole in Health (PITS); organizational field

Compartilhe

References


Amaral Filho, J., Mendes, L., Castro, F. J. A., & Lopes, N. M. (2010). Potencialidades e perspectivas para o desenvolvimento do complexo econômico industrial da saúde no estado do Ceará. Nota Técnica. Fundação Osvaldo Cruz–Fiocruz/Ceará. Grupo de Pesquisa em Saúde.

Amin, A. (1999). An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development. International journal of urban and regional research, 23(2), 365-378.

Asheim, B. T., Smith, H. L., & Oughton, C. (2011). Regional innovation systems: Theory, empirics and policy. Regional studies, 45(7), 875-891.

Bathelt, H., & Glückler, J. (2014). Institutional change in economic geography. Progress in human geography, 38(3), 340-363.

Becker, H. S. (1994). Métodos de pesquisa em Ciência Social. São Paulo: Hucitec.

Berger, P., L.& Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor.

Boschma, R. (2017). Relatedness as driver of regional diversification: A research agenda. Regional Studies, 51(3), 351-364.

Bourdieu, P. (1983). O campo científico. In R. Ortiz (Ed.). Pierre Bourdieu: sociologia. São Paulo: Ática, 122-155.

Brelàz, G. D., & Alves, M. A. (2013). O processo de institucionalização da participação na Câmara Municipal de São Paulo: uma análise das audiências públicas do orçamento (1990-2010). Revista de Administração Pública, 47, 803-826.

Canniford, R.; Dacin, T.; Dacin, P. (2019). The institutional custodianship of land and cloth: protecting, promoting and reviving harris tweed. Symposium Situated Institutions: The Role of Place, Space and Embeddedness in Institutional Dynamics - Academy of Management, 19(1).

Cellard, A. (2014). A análise documental. In Poupart, J. Et Al (Orgs). A pesquisa qualitativa: Enfoque epistemológicos e metodológicos. Petrópolis, Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 353-385.

Coe, N. M.; Hess, M. (2013). Global production networks, labor and development. Geoforum, 44, 4-9.

Cooper, R; Burrell, G. (1988). Modernism, postmodernism, and organizational analysis: an introduction. Organization studies, 9(1), 91-112.

Crawford, B.; Dacin, T. (2018) Institutional vigilantism and the protection of place. symposium situated institutions: the role of place, space and embeddedness in institutional dynamics. Academy of Management, 18(1).

Dacin, T., Zilber, T.B., Tracey, P., Boxenbaum, E., Canniford, R., Dacin, P., Dacin, T., Farny, S., Gray, B., Kibler, E., Putnam, L.L., Shepherd, D.; Svejenova, S. (2019). “Situated institutions: the role of place, space and embeddedness in institutional dynamics.” Academy of Management Meeting: Proceedings, 1.

Dacin, T.; Zilber, T.B.; Lounsbury, M. (2018). “Situated institutions: the role of place, space and embeddedness in institutional dynamics.” Academy of Management Meeting: Proceedings, 1.

Dimaggio, P. J. (1991) Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: US art museums, 1920-1940. In W. W. Powell; P. J. Dimaggio (Eds.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. London: University of Chicago Press, 267-292.

Dimaggio, P. J.; Powell, W. W. (1983). “The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.” American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.

Dimaggio, P.; Nag, M.; Blei, D. (2013). Exploiting affinities between topic modeling and the sociological perspective on culture: Application to newspaper coverage of US government arts funding. Poetics, 41(6), 570-606.

Dobbin, F. (1994). Cultural models of organization: the social construction of rational organizing principles. The sociology of culture: Emerging theoretical perspectives, 118.

Durkheim, É. (1893). De la division du travail social. Ancienne librairie Germer Baillière et cie.

Dutta, S.; Park, M. (2018) Exactly your grandpas shoes: historical legacies of place in revitalizing a decimated industry. Symposium Situated Institutions: the role of place, space and embeddedness in institutional dynamics. Academy of Management, 18(1).

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.

Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281-317.

Emirbayer, M.; Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023.

Everitt, J. G.; Levinson, B. A. (2016). Inhabited institutions in new destinations: Local sense-making and institutional work in community response to new immigration. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 45(2), 115-142.

Federação das Indústrias do Estado do Ceará – Fiec. (2018). Criação de uma entidade de amparo para as empresas do polo industrial e tecnológico da saúde.

Flick, U. (2004). Uma introdução à pesquisa qualitativa. Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Fligstein, N.; Mcadam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Nova York: Oxford University Press. Edição Kindle, 4392-4403.

Friedland, R.; Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell; P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. London: University of Chicago Press, 232-263.

Fundação Oswaldo Cruz – Fiocruz. (2021). Fiocruz Ceará. Recuperado 08 de maio de 2021, em Fiocruz: https://portal.fiocruz.br/fiocruz-ceara>.

Gherardi, S.; Strati, A. (2014). Administração e aprendizagem na prática. Elsevier Brasil.

Giddens, A. (2000). Dualidade da estrutura: agência e estrutura. Oerias: Celtra Editora.

Giddens, A. (Ed). (1989). Sociology. (2nd ed). Cambridge: Polity.

Gieryn, T. F. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual review of sociology, 26(1), 463-496.

Gluckler, R., Suddaby, R.; Lenz, R. (2018). Knowledge and institutions, knowledge, and space. Cham: Springer, 179–194.

Gray, D. E. (2012). Pesquisa no mundo real. Porto Alegre: Penso.

Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B.; Meyer, R. E. (2008). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage.

Greenwood, R; Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional entrepreneurship in mature field: The big five accounting firms. Academy of management Journal, 49, 27-48.

Grigoletto, F. (2018). O bairro Guapiruvu como lugar-organização: uma abordagem institucional do organizar. Tese - Doutorado em Administração Pública e Governo – Programa de Administração Pública e Governo, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 258f.

Grigoletto, F.; Alves, M. A. (2019). Leitura do institucionalismo organizacional a partir da teoria do organizar de Karl Weick. Cad. EBAPE.BR, 17(2), Rio de Janeiro.

Guarido Filho, E. R.; Costa, M. C. (2012). Contabilidade e institucionalismo organizacional: fundamentos e implicações para a a pesquisa. Revista de Contabilidade e Controladoria, UFP, Curitiba, 4(1), 20-41.

Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnates recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52-74.

Hallett, T.; Ventresca, M. J. (2006). Inhabited institutions: social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. Theory and Society, 35(2), 213-236.

Hallett, T; Meanwell, E. (2016). Accountability as an inhabited institution: contested meanings and the symbolic politics of reform. Symbolic Interaction, 39(3), 374-396.

Hoffman, A. J. (2001). Linking organizational and field-level analyses: the diffusion of corporate environmental practice. Organization & Environment, 14(2), 133-158.

Hsu, G., Hannan, M. T., & Koçak, Ö. (2009). Multiple category memberships in markets: An integrative theory and two empirical tests. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 150-169.

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - Ibge. (2021). Eusébio. Recuperado 05 de Maio de 2021, em Ibge: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/ce/eusebio/panorama

Jessop, B. (2001). Institutional re (turns) and the strategic–relational approach. Environment and planning A, 33(7), 1213-1235.

Kenis, P., & Knoke, D. (2002). How organizational field networks shape interorganizational tie-formation rates. Academy of management review, 27(2), 275-293.

Kibler, E., Farny, S.; Shepherd, D. (2019). Situated memory making after an extreme disruption of the local social order. Symposium Situated Institutions: The Role of Place, Space and Embeddedness in Institutional Dynamics - Academy of Management, 19(1).

Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual review of sociology, 167-195.

Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2011). Institutional work: refocusing institutional studies of organization. Journal of management inquiry, 20(1), 52-58.

Leblebici, H., Salancik, G. R., Copay, A., & King, T. (1991). Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: an organizational history of the US radio broadcasting industry. Administrative science quarterly, 333-363.

Lee, S., Ock, Y. J., Kim, M.; Schrock, G. (2021). The Regional Uneven Development and the State Intervention to Reshape the Spatial Hierarchy. International Journal of Regional Development, 8(2).

Lindberg, K.; Czarniawska, B. (2006). Knotting the action net or organizing between organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 22(4), 292-306.

Machado-Da-Silva, C. L., Guarido Filho, E. R.; Rossoni L. (2010). Campos Organizacionais: Seis Diferentes Leituras e a Perspectiva de Estruturação. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 14, 109-147.

Martin, R. (2000). Institutional approaches in economic geography. A companion to economic geography, 77-94.

Marx, K.; Engels, F. (1845). The ruling class and the ruling ideas. Media and Cultural Studies, 9.

Medeiros, A. K. D., Alves, M. A., & Farah, M. F. S. (2015). Programa Cultura Viva e o campo organizacional da cultura: análise de políticas públicas pela perspectiva institucionalista. Revista de Administração Pública, 49, 1215-1235.

Medeiros, Anny K. (2013). Políticas públicas e organizações culturais: o caso do programa Cultura Viva. Dissertação (mestrado) — Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas, São Paulo.

Merriam, S. B. (1988) Case study research in education. A qualitative approach. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass.

Merton, R. K. (1940). Fact and factitiousness in ethnic opinionnaires. American Sociological Review, 5(1), 13-28.

Meyer, John W.; Rowan, Brian. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American journal of sociology, 83(2), 340-363.

Mohr, J. W.; Bogdanov, Petko. (2013). Introduction —Topic models: What they are and why they matter.

Mohr, J. W.; Guerra-Pearson, F. (2010). The duality of niche and form: the differentiation of institutional space in New York City, 1888−1917. In G. Hsu, G. Negro.; Ö. Koçak (Eds.), Categories in markets: Origins and evolution. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 31, 321-368.

Parsons, T. (1956). Suggestions for a Sociological Approach to the Theory of Organizations-I. Administrative science quarterly, 63-85.

Powell, Walter W.; Colyvas, Jeannette A. (2008). Micro foundations of institutional theory. In: Greenwood, Royston et al. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage, 276-298.

Powell, Walter W.; Dimaggio, Paul J. (2012). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. University of Chicago press.

Powell, Walter. W.; Dimaggio, P. J. (1991). Introduction. In: Powell, W. W.; Dimaggio, P. J. (Ed.). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1-38.

Reay, T.; Hinings, C. B. (2005). The recomposition of an organizational field: Health care in Alberta. Organization Studies, 26(3), 351-384.

Reyes, D. V. (2015). Inhabiting Latino politics: How colleges shape students’ political styles. Sociology of Education, 88(4), 302-319.

Rossoni, L.; Machado-Da-Silva, C. L. (2010). Institucionalismo organizacional e práticas de governança corporativa. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, Curitiba, Edição Especial, 7, 173-198.

Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. v. Savigny (Eds.). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge, 1-14.

Schatzki, T. R. (2005). The sites of organizations. Organization Studies, 26(3), 465-484.

Schatzki, T. R. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1863-1873.

Scott, A. J. (1995). The Geographic Foundations of Industrial Performance. Competition & Change, 1(1), 51–66.

Scott, W. R. (1994). Conceptualizing organizational fields: linking organizations and societal systems. In H. Derlien, U. Gerhardt, & F. Scharpf (Eds.). Systems rationality and partial interests, Baden: Nomos, 203-221.

Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage publications.

Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: a study in the sociology of formal organization. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

Seo, M. G., & Creed, W. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of management review, 27(2), 222-247.

Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: a practical handbook. London: Sage.

Smets, M., Greenwood, R.; Lounsbury, M. (2015). An institutional perspective on strategy as practice. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.) The Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice, (2 ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 283-300.

Smets, M.; Aristidou, A.; Whittington, R. (2017). Towards a practice-driven institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. Meyer (Eds.) The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, (2nd ed.): London: Sage, 384-411.

Spencer, H. (1876). First principles of a new system of philosophy. D. Appleton & Company.

Stanfield, J. R.; Carrol, M. C. (2004). Governance, and the legitimacy of corporate power: a path for convergence of heterodox economic? Journal of Economic Issues, 38(2), 363-370.

Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social Structure and Organizations. In: March, JP, Ed., Handbook of Organizations, Rand McNally, Chicago, 142-193.

Suddaby, R. (2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of management inquiry, 19(1), 14-20.

Suddaby, R., Seidl, D.; Lê, J. K. (2013). Strategy-as-practice meets neoinstitutional theory. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 329-344.

Suddaby, R.; Foster, W. M.; Mills, A. J. (2013). Historical Institutionalism. In M. Bucheli.; D. Wadhwani (Eds.). Organizations in time: History, theory, methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University, 100−123.

Svejenova, S.; Boxenbaum, E. (2019). The library as a place of social inclusion: verbal and visual approaches of the NYPL. Symposium Situated Institutions: The Role of Place, Space and Embeddedness in Institutional Dynamics - Academy of Management, 19(1).

Tavora Filho, A. A. F. (2018). Projeto Ceará 2050: Estudo Setorial – Projetos e Empreendimentos Estruturantes. Fortaleza.

Thornton, P. H.; Ocasio, W.; Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective: a New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Oxford University Press, USA.

Tocqueville, A. (1835). Government of the Democracy in America. Democracy in America.

Troiano, M.; Riscado, P. (2016). Instituições e o Institucionalismo: notas acerca da construção do debate e seus principais desafios na contemporaneidade. Revista Política Hoje, 25(1), 113-132.

Tsang, K. K. (2019). The Interactional–Institutional Construction of Teachers’ Emotions in Hong Kong: The Inhabited Institutionalism Perspective. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 2619.

Vaara, E.; Whittington, R. (2012). Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously. The Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 1-52.

Veblen, T. (1898). Why is economics not an evolutionary science? The quarterly journal of economics, 12(4), 373-397.

Weber, M. (1904). Die" Objektivität" sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. Archiv für sozialwissenschaft und sozialpolitik, 19(1), 22-87.

Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading: Addison- Wesley.

Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.

Weick, K. E.; Sutcliffe, K. M.; Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409-421.

Whitehead, A. L. (2017). Institutionalized norms, practical organizational activity, and loose coupling: Inclusive congregations’ responses to homosexuality. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 56(4), 820-835.

Willmott, H. (2015). Why institutional theory cannot be critical. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(1), 105-111.

Wright, A. L.; Meyer, A. D.; Reay, T. (2018). Maintaining places of social inclusion: ebola and the emergency department. symposium situated institutions: the role of place, space and embeddedness in institutional dynamics. Academy of Management, 18(1).

Yin, R, K. (1993). Applications of the case study research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.

Zilber, T.B. (2006) The work of the symbolic in institutional processes: Translations of rational myths in Israeli high tech. Academy of management journal, 49 (2), 281-303.

Zilber, T.B. (2018). Know thy place: Location and imagined communities in institutional field dynamics. In: J. Gluckler, R. Suddaby.; R. Lenz (eds.): Knowledge and Institutions, Knowledge, and Space. Cham: Springer, 179–194.

Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1398-1438.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.