Displacement and career transition of older workers
Full Text:
PDF (Português (Brasil))Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the career transition of older workers who had their corporate careers interrupted by lay-off. A qualitative and exploratory research approach was employed, involving 21 professionals aged between 45 and 60 years, who held managerial positions and were displaced from the private organizations in which they work. Data were obtained through individual interviews, conducted using the biographical method. The results revealed that the career transition was influenced by contextual and individual factors, including labor market conditions, ageism, duration of the transition, financial situation, social support, and individual characteristics. Regarding the transition results, three groups were identified and labelled as excluded, precarized, and nostalgic, according to their position in relation to the formal labor market. Despite having followed different paths, all participants found themselves in a notably worse position than before. From a theoretical perspective, these results allow us to question the career models that emphasize individual agency over contextual aspects. From an applied perspective, by bringing evidence of the vulnerability of older workers, we hope to draw attention to the need for public policies and organizational practices focused on valorizing the professional group.
Keywords
References
Altman, R. (2015). A new vision for older workers: Retain, retrain, recruit. Recuperado em 8 set. 2024 de https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a809c64e5274a2e87dbacc1/a-new-vision-for-older-workers.pdf.
Arthur, M. B. (2014). The boundaryless career at 20: Where do we stand, and where can we go? Career Development International, 19(6), 627–640.
Arthur, M. B., Hall, D. T., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Generating new directions in career theory: the case for a transdisciplinary approach. In M. B. Arthur, D. T. Hall, & B. S. Lawrence (Eds.). Handbook of career theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ashforth, B. E., & Saks, A. M. (1995). Work-role transitions: a longitudinal examination of the Nicholson model. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68(2), 157–175.
Azevedo, M. C., Tonelli, M. J., & Silva, A. L. (2015). Contratos flexíveis de trabalho: diferentes perfis de trabalhadores qualificados brasileiros. RAUSP, 50(3), 277–291.
Baruch, Y., & Vardi, Y. (2016). A fresh look at the dark side of contemporary careers: toward a realistic discourse. British Journal of Management, 27(2), 355–372.
Bosch, N., & ter Weel, B. (2013). Labour-market outcomes of older workers in the Netherlands: Measuring job prospects using the occupational age structure. De Economist, 161(2), 199–218.
Brand, J. E. (2015). The far-reaching impact of job loss and unemployment. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 359–375.
Brasil (2019). Emenda Constitucional Nº 103, de 12 de novembro de 2019. Recuperado em 8 set. 2024 de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Emendas/Emc/emc103.htm.
Brown, P., Hesketh, A., & Wiliams, S. (2003). Employability in a knowledge-driven economy. Journal of Education and Work, 16(2), 107–126.
Butler, R. N. (2005). Ageism: Looking back over my shoulder. Generations, 29(3), 84–86.
Caldas, M. P. (1998). Demissão, plural e singular: um estudo sobre enxugamentos de pessoal no nível organizacional e sobre perda de emprego no nível individual. Tese de Doutorado, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Camarano, A. A. (2014). Introdução. In A. A. Camarano (Org.). Novo regime demográfico: uma nova relação entre população e desenvolvimento? Rio de Janeiro: IPEA.
Campbell, N. (1999). The decline of employment among older people in Britain. CASE paper, 19, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics. Recuperado em 8 set. 2024 de https://ssrn.com/abstract=1158910
Cappelli, P. (1999). The new deal at work. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Cepellos, V. M., & Tonelli, M. J. (2017). Envelhecimento profissional: percepções e práticas de gestão da idade. Revista Alcance, 24(1), 4–21.
Chudzikowski, K. (2012). Career transitions and career success in the “new” career era. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(2), 298–306.
Clarke, M. (2009). Boundaries and barriers: a study of managers in career transition. International Journal of Employment Studies, 17(2), 34–66.
Clarke, M. (2013). The organizational career: not dead but in need of redefinition. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(4), 684–703.
Defillippi, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1994). The boundaryless career: a competency-based perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(4), 307–324.
De Vos, A., Jacobs, S., & Verbruggen, M. (2021). Career transitions and employability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126, 103475.
Eisenhardt, K. M., Graebner, M. E., & Sonenshein, S. (2016). Grand challenges and inductive methods: Rigor without rigor mortis. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1113–1123.
Fasbender, U., Vignoli, M., & Topa, G. (2022). Understanding how aging experiences shape late career development. Career Development Quarterly, 70(3), 174–189.
Fontes Filho, J. R. (2013). A morte começa aos 40 ... ou o repensar da nova carreira? In M. Balassiano & I. S. A. Costa (Orgs.). Gestão de carreiras: dilemas e perspectivas. São Paulo: Editora Atlas.
Forrier, A., De Cuyper, N., & Akkermans, J. (2018). The winner takes it all, the loser has to fall: Provoking the agency perspective in employability research. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(4), 511–523.
Fournier, G., Zimmermann, H., & Gauthier, C. (2011). Instable career paths among workers 45 and over: Insight gained from long-term career trajectories. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(3), 316–327.
Francioli, S. P., & North, M. S. (2021). The older worker: gender and age discrimination in the workplace. In Schaie K. Warner, & Willis Sherry L. (Eds.). Handbook of the Psychology of Aging, 215-235. (9th ed.), Academic Press.
Friese, S. (2019). Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS.ti. (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 14–38.
Goldani, A. M. (2010). Desafios do “preconceito etário” no Brasil. Educação & Sociedade, 31(111), 411–434.
Gomes, M. S. E. A. (2002). Empregabilidade nos tempos de reestruturação e flexibilização: trajetórias de trabalho e narrativas de ex-empregados do setor elétrico brasileiro. Tese de Doutorado, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciências Sociais, UFRJ, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.
Gomes da Silva, J. R., Wetzel, U., & Lopes, A. L. S. V. (2008). A visão de trabalhadores maduros com formação superior sobre sua condição no contexto das novas relações de trabalho no Brasil. In Encontro Nacional da ANPAD, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 32.
Gowan, M. A. (2014). Moving from job loss to career management: the past, present, and future of involuntary job loss research. Human Resource Management Review, 24(3), 258–270.
Hanashiro, D. M. M., & Pereira, M. F. M. W. M. (2020). O etarismo no local de trabalho: Evidências de práticas de “saneamento” de trabalhadores mais velhos. Revista Gestão Organizacional, 13(2), 188–206.
Hanisch, K. A. (1999). Job loss and unemployment research from 1994 to 1998: A review and recommendations for research and intervention. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55(2), 188–220.
Harvey, D. (2004) Condição pós-moderna. (13ª ed.), São Paulo: Edições Loyola.
Helal, D. H. (2005). Flexibilização organizacional e empregabilidade individual: proposição de um modelo explicativo. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, III(1), 1–15.
Ibarra, H. (2004). Career transition and change. INSEAD Faculty & Research, Working paper series, 97. Recuperado em 8 set. 2024 de https://flora.insead.edu/fichiersti_wp/inseadwp2004/2004-97.pdf.
Ibarra, H. (2009). Identidade de carreira: a experiência é a chave para reinventá-la. São Paulo: Editora Gente.
IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2023a). Censo Demográfico 2022. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2023b). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua: Terceiro trimestre de 2023. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
Latack, J. C., & Dozier, J. B. (1986). After the ax falls: Job loss as a career transition. Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 375–392.
Lawton, C., & Wheatley, D. (2018). The quality of work among older workers. In V. Caven & S. Nachmias (Eds.), Hidden Inequalities in the Workplace, 91–126, Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lemos, A. H. C., & Costa, A. M. (2012). A dimensão simbólica da empregabilidade: mercado, políticas públicas e organização social do trabalho. Sociedade, Contabilidade e Gestão, 7(2), 85–103.
Loth, G. B., & Silveira, N. (2014). Etarismo nas organizações: um estudo dos estereótipos em trabalhadores envelhecentes. Revista de Ciências da Administração, 16(39), 65–82.
Lyons, S. T., Schweitzer, L., Ng, E. S. W., & Kuron, L. K. J. (2012). Comparing apples to apples: A qualitative investigation of career mobility patterns across four generations. Career Development International, 17(4), 333–357.
Mainiero, L. A., & Sullivan, S. E. (2005). Kaleidoscope careers: an alternate explanation for the “opt-out” revolution. Academy of Management Perspectives, 19(1), 106–123.
Mayrhofer, W., Meyer, M., & Steyrer, J. (2007). Contextual issues in the study of careers. In H. P. Gunz & M. Peiperl (Eds.) Handbook of Career Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McKee-Ryan F., Song Z., Wanberg C. R., Kinicki A.J. (2005). Psychological and physical well-being during unemployment: a meta-analytic study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 53–76.
Minichiello, V., Browne, J., & Kendig, H. (2000). Perceptions and consequences of ageism: views of older people. Ageing and Society, 20(3), 253–278.
Mitiko, D., & Hanashiro, M. (2024). Programas para contratação de trabalhadores mais velhos: a visão dos gestores de RH. Organizações em Contexto, 20(39), 267–297.
Náder, F. M. J. & Oliveira, L. B. (2007). Empregabilidade: uma análise histórica e crítica. In Encontro Nacional da ANPAD, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 31.
Naegele, L., De Tavernier, W., & Hess, M. (2018). Work environment and the origin of ageism. In Ayalon L., Tesch-Römer C. (eds.). Contemporary Perspectives on Ageism. International Perspectives on Aging, 19. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Nelson, T. D. (2015). Ageism. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination, (2nd Ed), 337-353. New York: Psychology Press.
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008). The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 392–423.
OECD – Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2020). Promoting an age-inclusive workforce: living, learning and earning longer. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD – Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2023). Retaining talent at all ages. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Peake, S., & McDowall, A. (2012). Chaotic careers: a narrative analysis of career transition themes and outcomes using chaos theory as a guiding metaphor. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 40(4), 395–410.
Pereira, M. F. M. W. M., & Hanashiro, D. M. M. (2014). Etarismo em seleção: a dura realidade para quem tem mais de 45 anos no Brasil. In Encontro Nacional da ANPAD, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 38.
Posthuma, R. A., & Campion, M. A. (2009). Age stereotypes in the workplace: Common stereotypes, moderators, and future research directions. Journal of Management, 35(1), 158–188.
Quishida, A., & Casado, T. (2009). Adaptação à transição de carreira na meia-idade. Revista Brasileira de Orientação Profissional, 10(2), 81–92.
Roscigno, V. J., Zheng, H., & Crowley, M. (2022). Workplace age discrimination and social-psychological well-being. Society and Mental Health, 12(3), 195–214.
Schlossberg, N. K. (1981). A model for analyzing human adaptation to transition. The Counseling Psychologist, 9(2), 2–18.
Silva, R. A., & Helal, D. H. (2019). Ageismo nas organizações: questões para debate. Revista de Administração IMED, 9(1), 187–197.
Silver, C., & Lewins, A. (2014). Computer-assisted analysis of qualitative research. In P. Leavy (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sullivan, S. E., & Al Ariss, A. (2021). Making sense of different perspectives on career transitions: A review and agenda for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 31(1), 100727.
Sullivan, S. E., & Arthur, M. B. (2006). The evolution of the boundaryless career concept: Examining physical and psychological mobility. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 19–29.
Van der Horst, A. C., Klehe, U. C., & Van der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2017). Adapting to a looming career transition: how age and core individual differences interact. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 132–145.
Vansteenkiste, S., Deschacht, N., & Sels, L. (2015). Why are unemployed aged fifty and over less likely to find a job? A decomposition analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 55–65.
Wanberg, C. R. (2012). The individual experience of unemployment. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 369-396
Wanberg, C. R., Kanfer, R., Hamann, D. J., & Zhang, Z. (2016). Age and reemployment success after job loss: An integrative model and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 142(4), 400–426.
Wengraf, T (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: biographic narratives and semi-structured methods. London: Sage Publications.
World Health Organization (WHO). (1993). Aging and working capacity. WHO Technical Report Series 835. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Zhou, W., Guan, Y., Xin, L., Mak, M. C. K., & Deng, Y. (2016). Career success criteria and locus of control as indicators of adaptive readiness in the career adaptation model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 94, 124–130.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.