STRATEGIC MAKING: PUBLIC POLICIES FROM PRACTICE

Jackeline Amantino de Andrade
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5329/RECADM.20111001004

Abstract

This paper argues that the notion of strategy should also permeate the government. Part is thus the assumption that the development of theories of strategy brings an important contribution to public policy. This understanding is particularly significant considering the overcoming of classical bases of strategic planning of prescriptive nature and the need for understanding of processes related to strategic practice. This article is organized in addition to the introductory section in five other sections. The first strategic approaches are addressed specifically considering the classical and the process by opening the analysis of strategy as practice given its relevance to the design of public policy formation. The second seeks to contribute conceptually to the analysis of "strategic doing" bringing the contribution of actor-network theory (ART). After methodological aspects are approach and a specific policy is analyzed from the plot of actors to produce translations that support emerging strategies in the process of its formation. Finally, the last section presents the findings on the argument presented here.


Keywords

Strategy; public policies; actor-network theory

Compartilhe

References


Ansoff, H. I. (1977). Estratégia empresarial. São Paulo: McGraw Hill.

Barthes, R. (1985). Elementos de semiologia. São Paulo: Cultrix.

Bertero, C. O., Vasconcelos, F. C. e Binder, M. P. (2003). Estratégia empresarial: a produção científica brasileira entre 1991 e 2002. Revista de Administração de Empresas. 43 (4), pp. 48-62.

Callon, M. (1986). The sociology of an actor-network. In: Callon, Ml, Law, J & RIP, A. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: Macmillan Press.

Law, J & RIP, A (1999). Actor-network theory, the market test. In:

Law, J. & Hassard, J. Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackweel Publishers, pp. 181-195.

Law, J. & Hassard, J Law, J. & RIP, A. (1986). How to study the force of science. In: Callon, M., Law, J. & RIP, A. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London: Macmillan Press, pp. 3-15

Chaffee, E. (1985) Three models of strategy. Academy of Management Review. 10, (1), pp. 89-98.

Chandler, A. D. (1962). Strategy and structure, chapthers in the history of the American industrial enterprise. Cambridge: MIT Press.

ECO, U. (1980). Tratado geral de semiótica. São Paulo: Perspectiva.

Fairclough, N. (2001). Discurso e mudança social. Brasília: Editora UnB.

Fontana, A & Frey, J. H. (2000) The interview from structural questions to negotiated text. In: Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Ed.) Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 645-672.

Foucault, M. (1995). A arqueologia do saber (4a ed.). Rio de Janeiro: Forense.

Frey, K. (2000). Políticas públicas: um debate conceitual e reflexões referentes à prática da análise de políticas públicas no Brasil. Planejamento e Políticas Públicas, 21, pp. 211-259.

Godoi, C. K.. (2006) .Perspectivas de análise do discurso nos estudos organizacionais. In: Godoi, C. K; Bandeira-De-Mello, R. e Silva, A. B. (Org.). Pesquisa qualitativa em estudos organizacionais: paradigmas, estratégias e métodos. São Paulo: Editora Saraiva. pp. 375-401.

Godoi, C. K. e Balsini, C. P. V. (2006). A pesquisa qualitativa nos estudos organizacionais brasileiros: uma análise bibliométrica. In: Godoi, C. K; Bandeira-De-Mello, R. e Silva, A. B. (Org.). Pesquisa qualitativa em estudos organizacionais: paradigmas, estratégias e métodos. São Paulo: Editora Saraiva. pp. 89-114.

Hardy, C., Palmer, I. & Philips, N. (2000). Discourse as a strategic resource. Human Relations, 53, (9), pp. 1227-1248. doi: 10.1177/0018726700539006

Hatch, M. J. (1997). Organization theory, modern symbolic and postmodern perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Knights, D. & Morgan, G. (1991). Corporate strategy, organizations, and subjectivity: a critique. Organizations Studies.12, (2), pp. 251-273. doi: 10.1177/017084069101200205

Latour B. (1994). Jamais fomos modernos. São Paulo: Editora 34.

Latour B. (1997). On actor-network theory – a few clarifications. Socialize Welt, 47, pp. 369-381, http://www.nettime.org/List.

Latour B. (2000). Ciência em ação. São Paulo: Editora UNESP.

Latour B. (2001). A esperança de pandora. São Paulo: Edusc.

Latour B. (2004). Políticas da Natureza. São Paulo: Editora Edusc.

Latour B. (2005). Reassembling the social, an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford Press.

Law , J. & Hetherington, K (2000). Materialities, spatialities, globalities. http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/soc029jl.html.

Lindblom. C. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review. 19, pp. 79-88. doi: 10.2307/973677

Mintzberg. H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science. 24 (9), pp. 934-978. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.24.9.934

Mintzberg. H. (1994). The rise and fall of strategic planning, reconceiving roles for planning, plans, planners. New York: The Free Press.

Mintzberg. H., Ahlstrand, B. & Lampel, J. (2000). Safári da estratégia. Porto Alegre: Bookman.

Mintzberg. H. & Jorgensen, J. (1995). Una estrategia emergente para la política pública. Gestión y Política Pública, IV (1), pp. 25-46.

Mintzberg. H. & Waters, J. (1985). Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal, 6, pp. 257-272. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250060306

Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics, a word and some questions. In: Law, J. & Hassard, J. Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackweel Publishers, pp. 74-89.

Pettigrew, A. M. (1977). Strategy formulation as a political process. International Studies of Management. 7, pp. 78-87.

Pettigrew, A. M. (1992). The character and significance of strategy process research. Strategic Management Journal. 13, pp. 5-16. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250130903

Philips, N. & Hardy, C (2002). Discourse analysis. London: Sage.

Quinn, J. B. (1980). Strategies for change: logical incrementalism. Homewood: Richard Irwin.

Richardson, R. J. (2007). Pesquisa Social: Métodos e Técnicas (3a ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.

Schwartzman, S. (1994). Os Dinossauros de Roraima (ou Sociologia da Ciência e da Técnica de Bruno Latour), Novos Estudos Cebrap, 39, pp. 172-179.

Stake, R (1995). The art of case research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Subirats, J. (1993). Análisis de políticas pública y gestión pública: promesas y riesgos de uma vida en común. Ekonomiaz, 26, pp. 144-149.

Teil, G. & Latour, B. (1995). The hume machine, can association networks do more than formal rules? SEHR, 4, (2).

Torronen, J. (2002). Semiotic theory on qualitative interviewimg using stimulus texts. Qualitative Resarch, 2 (3), pp. 343-362. doi: 10.1177/146879410200200304

Volberda, H. W. (2004) Crise em estratégia: fragmentação, integração ou síntese. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 44 (4), pp. 32-43.

Wilson, D. & Jarzabkowiski, P. (2004). Pensando e agindo estrategicamente: novos desafios para a análise estratégica. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 44, (4), pp. 11-20.

Whipp, R. (1996). Creative desconstruction: strategy and organizatons. In: Clegg, Stewart; Hardy, Cynthia; Nord, Walter (eds.) Handbook of organization studies. London: Sage, pp. 261-275.

Whittington, R. (2004) Estratégia após o modernismo: recuperando a prática. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 44, (4), pp. 44-53.

Whittington, R. (2006). O que é estratégia. São Paulo: Thomson.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.