A Influência da autorregulação nas heurísticas e vieses utilizados no processo de tomada de decisão
Texto completo:
ArtigoResumo
Entre as diferentes teorias heurísticas que visam explicar o processo decisório, este estudo explora a falácia do jogador e a teoria da mão-quente. O objetivo deste artigo é investigar a influência da autorregulação afetiva nas heurísticas e vieses utilizados no processo de tomada de decisão. Foram realizados dois experimentos. No primeiro, foi avaliado se os resultados anteriores de ganhos com ações de empresas afetavam a preferência dos consumidores pela compra ou venda dessas ações. Constatou-se diferença entre gêneros no processo decisório, com a ocorrência da falácia do jogador para a amostra masculina, mas não para a amostra feminina. O segundo experimento foi realizado com o intuito de verificar o papel da autorregulação nestas heurísticas. Após a indução de autorregulação, observou-se a ocorrência da falácia do jogador e o viés da mão quente em algumas condições, indicando alterações nas decisões tomadas pelos consumidores. A partir desses resultados, conclui-se que há uma influência significativa do estado afetivo nas tomadas de decisão e que as mulheres são menos suscetíveis à falácia do jogador do que os homens.
Palavras-chave
Referências
Aaker, J. L., & Lee, A. (2001). “I” Seek Pleasures and “We” Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(June), 33-49.
Arkes, J., & Martinez, J. (2011). Finally, evidence for a momentum effect in the NBA. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 7(3).
Bonassi, F. V., Stern, R. B., & Wechsler, S. (2008). The Gambler's Fallacy: A Bayesian Approach. AIP Conference Proceedings. Melville: American Institute of Physics, v.1073, 8-15.
Bower, B. (2010). Gambling on experience: Perceptions of risk can get pulled in opposite directions. Science News, 177(9), 26-29.
Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (2006). Foundations of multimethod research: synthesizing styles. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Clotfelter, C. T., & Cook, P. J. (1993). The “Gamblers Fallacy” in Lottery Play. Management Science, 39(12), 1521-1525.
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender Differences in Preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 1-27.
Crosson, R., & Sundali, J. (2005). The Gambler’s Fallacy and the Hot Hand: Empirical Data from Casinos. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30(3), 195-209.
Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations: Promotion and Prevention in Decision-Making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(February), 117-132.
Dong G., Lin X., Zhou H., & Du X. (2014). Decision-making after continuous wins or losses in a randomized guessing task: implications for how the prior selection results affect subsequent decision-making. Behavioral And Brain Functions, 10, 1-11.
Fishbach, A., & Ferguson, M. (2007). The Goal Construct in Social Psychology. Invited Chapter In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. (Vol. II, pp. 490-515). New York: Guilford Press.
Freitas, A. L., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying Goal-Directed Action: The Role of Regulatory Fit. Psychological Science, 13(January), 1-6.
Freitas, A. L., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Regulatory Fit and Resisting Temptation during Goal Pursuit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 291-298.
Friedman, R., & Förster, J. (2001). The Effects of Promotion and Prevention Cues on Creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001-1013.
Gaur, A. S., & Gaur, S. S. (2009). Statistical Methods for Practice and Research: A guide to data analysis using SPSS. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Gilovich, T., Vallone R., & Tversky, A. (1985). The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 295-314.
Gonçalves, M. A. (2009). Quando o Dinheiro Compra Mais Felicidade? O Papel da Self-Regulation na Felicidade de Consumidores com Experiências e Bens Materiais. Dissertação de mestrado, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Goodwin, C. J. (2008). Research in Psychology: Methods and Design. (5. ed.). New York: Wiley.
Goodwin, P., & Wright, G. (2000). Decision Analysis for Management Judgment. (2. ed.). New York: Wiley.
Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. (7. ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond Pleasure and Pain. American Psychologist,52(December), 1280-1300.
Higgins, E. T., Christopher, J. R., Roney, E. C., & Hymes, C. (1994). Ideal Versus Ought Predilections for Approach and Avoidance - Distinct Self-Regulatory Systems, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 276-286.
James, B. R. (2004). Probabilidade: um curso em nível intermediário. (3. ed.) Rio de Janeiro: IMPA.
Johnson, J., & Tellis, G. (2005). Blowing Bubbles: Heuristics and Biases in the Run-Up of Stock Prices. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 486-503.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
Koehler, J. J., & Conley, C. A. (2003). The ‘‘hot hand’’ myth in professional basketball. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 25, 253-259.
Kudryavtsev, A., Cohen, G., & Hon-Snir, S. (2013). “Rational” or “Intuitive”: Are Behavioral Biases Correlated Across Stock Market? Contemporary Economics. 7(2), 31-53.
Kuhnen, C. M., & Knutson, B. (2011). The Influence of Affect on Beliefs, Preferences, and Financial Decisions. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(3), 605-626.
Lee, K., Choi, J., & Li, Y. (2014). Regulatory focus as a predictor of attitudes toward partitioned and combined pricing. Journal Of Consumer Psychology (Elsevier Science), 24(3), 355-362.
Lehmann, D. R., Gupta, S. & Steckel, J. H. (1998). Marketing Research. Prentice-Hall.
Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., Camacho, C. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1999). Promotion and Prevention Choices Between Stability and Change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(December), 1135-1145.
Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The Role of Affect in Decision Making. In: R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of Affective Sciences. (pp. 619-642). New York: Oxford University Press.
Loh, R. K., & Warachka, M. (2012). Streaks in Earnings Surprises and the Cross-Section of Stock Returns. Management Science, 58(i7), 1305-1321.
Lyons, J., Weeks, D. J., & Elliott, D. (2013). The gambler’s fallacy: A basic inhibitory process? Frontiers in Psychology, 4(72), 1-11.
Mourão Júnior, C. A. (2009). Questões em bioestatística: o tamanho da amostra. Revista Interdisciplinar de Estudos Experimentais, v. 1, n. 1, p. 26-28.
Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis using SPSS for Windows (4rd ed.), Open University Press: McGraw-Hill.
Rabin, M., & Vayanos, D. (2010). The Gambler's and Hot-Hand Fallacies: Theory and Applications. The Review of Economic Studies, 77(2), 730-778.
Roney, C. J. R., & Trick, L. M. (2003). Grouping and Gambling: A Gestalt Approach to the Gambler's Fallacy. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57(2), 69-75.
Roney, C. J. R., & Trick, L. M. (2009). Sympathetic Magic and Perceptions of Randomness: The Hot Hand Versus the Gambler's Fallacy. Thinking and Reasoning, 15(2), 197-210.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs: For Generalized Causal Inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Shah, J., Higgins, E. T., & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance Incentives and Means: How Regulatory Focus Influences Goal Attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(February), 285-293.
Silva, D. M. L. (2011). Relação Entre Atingimento de Meta e Autorregulação na Decisão de Compra de Produto de Consumo. Tese de doutorado, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Sirri, E., & Tufano, P. (1998). Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows. Journal of Finance, 53, 1589-1622.
Smith, G., Levere, M.; & Kurtzman, R. (2009). Poker Play Behavior After Big Wins and Big Losses. Management Science, 55(9), 1547-1555.
Suetens, S., & Tyran, J. R. (2012). The Gambler’s Fallacy and Gender. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 83(1), 118-124.
Trope, Y, & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440-463.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105-110.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, New Series, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (2000). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. In: T. Connolly, H. R. Arkes, & K. R. Hammond (Eds.) Judgment and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader. (2a ed). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Viacava, J. J. C. (2012). A Influência das Avaliações de Satisfação e das Variações de Preço nas Decisões de Compra nos Serviços Bancários Brasileiros. Dissertação de mestrado, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil.
Xi, Z., Scholer, A. A., & Higgins, E. (2014). In Pursuit of Progress: Promotion Motivation and Risk Preference in the Domain of Gains. Journal Of Personality & Social Psychology, 106(2), 183-201.
Xu, J., & Harvey, N. (2014). Carry on winning: The gamblers’ fallacy creates hot hand effects in online gambling. Cognition, 131, 173-180.
Xue, G., Lu, Z., Levin, I. P., & Bechara, A. (2011). An fMRI study of risk-taking following wins and losses: Implications for the gambler’s fallacy. Human Brain Mapp, 32(2), 271-281.
Yaari, G., & Eisenmann, S. (2011). The hot (invisible?) hand: Can time sequence patterns of success/failure in sports be modeled as repeated random independent trials? PLoS ONE, 6(10).
Yuan, J., Sun, G.-Z., & Siu, R. (2014). The lure of illusory luck: How much are people willing to pay for random shocks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 106(October), 269-280.
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.