Cultura de Inovação em uma Escola de Negócios: um estudo inspirado pela teoria da prática
Texto completo:
PDFResumo
O objetivo do estudo é compreender os sentidos da inovação e como constituem a inteligibilidade da(s) prática(s) que suporta(m) a cultura de inovação em uma escola de negócios. A teoria da prática de Schatzki foi adotada como alternativa às abordagens comportamentais e individualistas. A pesquisa adotou a fenomenologia como método, a observação participante e entrevistas em profundidade como estratégias de coleta de dados e a semiótica fenomenológica como método de análise. Os resultados mostram que os sentidos da inovação estão em constante construção e são perpassados por contradições. A apreensão dessas contradições amplia a compreensão daqueles sentidos, possibilitando o acesso à construção da inteligibilidade da(s) prática(s) que sustentam a cultura de inovação. As contribuições teóricas são: ampliar a compreensão da inovação como uma prática; questionar a noção de cultura da inovação; apontar um caminho para estudar as condições nas quais a inovação ocorre. Do ponto de vista prático, o estudo aponta elementos importantes na criação de condições favoráveis à inovação. Na organização estudada, os resultados impactaram no Comitê de Inovação que mudou o foco da análise do portfólio de produtos já existentes, para a criação de uma cultura de inovação.
Palavras-chave
Referências
Ahmed, P. K. (1998). Culture and climate for innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1(1), 30-43.
Bruno-Faria, M. F., & Fonseca M. V. A. (2014, julho/agosto). Cultura de Inovação: Conceitos e Modelos Teóricos. Revista de Administração Contemporânea – RAC, 18(4), 372-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac20141025.
Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. A (2014). Phenomenological Perspective on Researching Work and Learning. In: BILLET, S. et al. (eds.) International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning. Dordrecht: Springer Science.
Dobni, C. B. (2008). Measuring innovation culture in organizations: the development of a generalized innovation culture construct using exploratory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 539-559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14601060810911156
Eikeland, O., & Nicolini, D. (2011). Turning practically: broadening the horizon. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24(2), 2011, 164 – 174.
Gherardi, S. (2009a). Introduction: The Critical Power of the ‘Practice Lens’. Management Learning, 40(2), 115-128.
Gherardi, S. (2009b). Knowing and Learning in Practice-based Studies: an introduction. The Learning Organization, 16(5), 352-359.
Gherardi, S. (2009c) Practice? It’s a matter of taste! Management Learning. 40(5), 535-550.
Gherardi, S. (2011). Organizational learning: the sociology of practices in Easterby-Smith & Lyles, M. Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management. Sussex: Wiley.
Gherardi, S. (2012). How to Conduct a Practice-based Study: problems and methods. Northampton: Edward Elgard Publishing Limited.
Giorgi, A. (2005) The phenomenological movement and research in the human sciences. Nursing Science Quartely, 18(1), 75-82.
Giorgi, A. (2007) Concerning the phenomenological methods of Husserl and Heidegger and their application in Psychology. Collectio du Cirp, 1, 63-78.
Gomes, G., Machado, D., & Alegre, J. (2015) Determinants of Innovation Culture: A Study of Textile Industry in Santa Catarina. Brazilian Business Review, 12(4), 99-122.
Harbi, S. E., Anderson, A. R., & Amamou, M. (2014). Innovation culture in small Tunisian ICT firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 21(1), 132-151.
doi: 10.1108/JSBED- 06-2013-0086
Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and Time: a revised edition of the Stambaugh translation. New York: State University of New York.
Husserl, E. (2006) Ideias para uma fenomenologia pura e para uma filosofia fenomenológica. Aparecida: Ideias & Letras.
Kaasa, A., & Vadi, M. (2010). How does culture contribute to innovation? Evidence from European countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(7), 583-604.
Lanigan, R. (1997). Capta versus data: método e evidência em comunicologia. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 10(1), 17-45.
Lanigan, R. (2013, February). Communicology and Culturology: semiotic phenomenological method in applied small group research. The Public Journal of Semiotics, 4(2), 71-103.
Martins, E. C., & Martins, N. (2002) An organisational culture model to promote creativity and innovation. Journal of Industry Psychology, 28(4), 58-65.
Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003) Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64-74.
Nicolini, D. (2013). Practice, Theory, Work and organization – an introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 28, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
Rodney, M. (2000, October/December). Knowledge management as a catalyst for innovation within organizations: a qualitative study. Knowledge and Process Management, 7(4), 233-259.
Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2011) Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 338-360.
Schatzki, T. R. (2006) On Organizations as they happen. Organizations Studies, 27(12), 1863–1873.
Schatzki, T. R. (2012) A Primer on Practices. In: Higgs, J., Barnett, R., Billet, S., Hutchings, M. & Trede, F. (eds.), Practice-Based Education: Perspectives and Strategies. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Schatzki, T. R. (2015) Practices, governance and sustainability. In: Strengers, Y. & Maller, C. (eds.), Social Practices, Intervention and Sustainability: beyond behaviour change, New York: Routledge.
Shove, E. (2010) Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A, 42(6), 1273-85. doi:10.1068/a42282
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012) The Dynamics of Social Practices: everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1982). Teoria do desenvolvimento econômico: uma investigação sobre lucros, capital, crédito, juro e o ciclo econômico. São Paulo: Abril Cultural.
Schutz. A. (2012). Sobre Fenomenologia e Relações Sociais. Petrópolis: Vozes.
Strengers, Y., Moloney, S., Maller C., & Horne, R. (2015) Beyond behaviour change: praqctical applications of social practice theory in behaviour change programmes. In: Strengers, Y. & Maller, C. (eds.), Social Practices, Intervention and Sustainability: beyond behaviour change, Rotterdam: Routledge.
Swedberg, R. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: the view of the young Schumpeter. In: Steyaert, C. & Hjorth, D. Entrepreneurship as social change: a third movements in entrepreneurship book. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Uzzi, B. (august de 1996). The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), pp. 674-698.
Uzzi, B. (March de 1997). Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67.
Uzkurt, C., Kumar, R., & Ensari, N. (2013). Assessing organizational readiness for innovation: an exploratory study on organizational characteristics of innovativeness. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 10(4), 1-26. doi: 10.1142/S0219877013500181
Walker, G. (2015). Beyond individual responsibility: social practice, capabilities and the right to environmentally sustainable ways of living. In: Strengers, Y. & Maller, C. (eds.), Social Practices, Intervention and Sustainability: beyond behaviour change. Rotterdam: Routledge.
Wilson, A. L., Ramamurthy, K., & Nystrom, P. C. (1999). A multi-attribute measure for innovation adoption: the context of imaging technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46 (3), 311-321.
Wolf, P., Kaudela-Baum, S., & Meissner, J. O. (2011). Exploring innovating cultures in small and medium-sized enterprises: findings from Central Switzerland. International Small Business Journal, 30(3), 242-274. doi: 10.1177/0266242610386666
Wood Jr., T., & Paes de Paula, A. P. (2002). Pop management: contos de paixão, lucro e poder. Organizações & Sociedade, 9(24), 39-51.
Wood Jr, T., & Paes de Paula, A. P. (2006). A mídia especializada e a cultura do management. Organizações & Sociedade, 13(38), 91-105.
Ziegler, R. (2010, October). Innovations in Doing and Being: Capability Innovations at the Intersection of Schumpeterian Political Economy and Human Development. Journal os Social Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 255-272.
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.