Relações que afetam a satisfação no teletrabalho domiciliar
Texto completo:
PDFResumo
A pandemia da COVID-19 forçou a adoção do teletrabalho domiciliar como alternativa à viabilização das operações de várias empresas, o que implicou adequações nos modelos de gestão. Assim, o objetivo deste artigo é identificar as relações entre estilos de liderança - transacional e transformacional, clima organizacional, satisfação do teletrabalhador e incivilidade do gestor no contexto do trabalho domiciliar, no curto prazo e, potencialmente, no longo prazo. A pesquisa é quantitativa com uso modelagem de equações estruturais estimadas por mínimos quadrados parciais. Os resultados mostram que ambos os estilos de liderança e o clima organizacional impactam positivamente a satisfação do teletrabalhador. Adicionalmente, o clima organizacional medeia parcialmente as relações entre estilos de liderança e satisfação do teletrabalhador. No entanto, o efeito moderador da incivilidade não é confirmado. Com isso, contribui-se com a organização em teletrabalho domiciliar total ou parcial, uma tendência pós-pandemia ou em novas situações semelhantes. Por meio da perspectiva da Teoria do Ajuste, destaca-se a relação entre os construtos estudados em um contexto virtual, o que contribui para o campo de estudos de gestão de pessoas.
Palavras-chave
Referências
Abbad, G. S., Legentil, J., Damascena, M., Miranda, L., Feital, C., & Neiva, E. R. (2019). Percepções de teletrabalhadores e trabalhadores presenciais sobre desenho do trabalho. Revista Psicologia: Organizações e Trabalho, 19(4), 772-780.
Akmalia, S., & Prihartono, B. (2023). Relationship between remote work, organizational climate, and work stress on employee performance. International Journal of Social Health, 2(9), 578-585.
Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science, 16(2), 40-68.
Anderson, H. J., Baur, J. E., Griffith, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (2017). What works for you may not work for (Gen) Me: limitations of present leadership theories for the new generation. The Leadership Quarterly, 28, 245–260.
Andrade, A. L. D., Matos, F. R., Lobianco, V. M. P., & Broseguini, G. B. (2020). (In) civilidade no trabalho: medidas e modelos. Revista Psicologia Organizações e Trabalho, 20(1), 914-921.
Arnold, K. A., & Walsh, M. M. (2015). Customer incivility and employee well-being: Testing the moderating effects of meaning, perspective taking and transformational leadership. Work & Stress, 29(4), 362-378.
Baker, E., Avery, G. C. & Crawford, J. (2007). Satisfaction and perceived productivity when professionals work from home. Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 15(1), 37-62.
Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19–31.
Belzunegui-Eraso, A., & Erro-Garcés, A. (2020). Teleworking in the context of the Covid-19 crisis. Sustainability, 12(9), 1-18.
Bianchi, E., Quishida, A., & Foroni, P. (2017). Atuação do líder na gestão estratégica de pessoas: reflexões, lacunas e oportunidades. RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 21(1), 41–61.
Bido, D. S., & Silva, D. (2019). SmartPLS 3: especificação, estimação, avaliação e relato. Raep - Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 20(2), 1-31.
Boudabbous, S. (2020). The relationship between job satisfaction and performance at work: case of Tunisian accounting firms. Accounting, 6(3), 231-240.
Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and opinions on SEM. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16.
Ciftci, E. E., Barreto, M., Doyle, D. M., van Breen, J., & Darden, S. (2020). Distancing or drawing together: sexism and organizational tolerance of sexism impact women's social relationships at work. European Journal of Social Psychology, 00, 1–16.
Collins, A. M., Hislop, D., & Cartwright, S. (2016). Social support in the workplace between teleworkers, office‐based colleagues, and supervisors. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(2), 161-175.
Contreras, F., Baykal, E., & Abid, G. (2020). E-leadership and teleworking in times of COVID-19 and beyond: What we know and where do we go. Frontiers in Psychology, 11,1-11.
Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6(1), 64.
Dahri, A. S., Qureshi, M. A., & Mallah, A. G. (2020). The negative effect of incivility on job satisfaction through emotional exhaustion moderated by resonant leadership. 3c Empresa: investigación y Pensamiento Crítico, 9(4), 93-123.
Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1984). A psychological theory of work adjustment: An individual-differences model and its applications. University of Minnesota press.
Day, D.V., Fleenor, J. W., Atwater, L. E., Sturm, R.E., & Mckee, R. A. (2014). Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 63-82.
De-la-Calle-Durán, M.-C., & Rodríguez-Sánchez, J.-L. (2021). Employee engagement and wellbeing in times of COVID-19: a proposal of the 5Cs model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18, 5470.
Donnelly, N., & Proctor‐Thomson, S. B. (2015). Disrupted work: home‐based teleworking (HbTW) in the aftermath of a natural disaster. New Technology, Work and Employment, 30(1), 47-61.
Doucet, O., Fredette, M., Simard, G., & Tremblay, M. (2015). Leader profiles and their effectiveness on employee outcomes. Human Performance, 28(3), 244–264.
Felstead, A., & Henseke, G. (2017). Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, well‐being, and work‐life balance. New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(3), 195-212.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Golden, T. D., & Gajendran, R. S. (2018). Unpacking the role of a telecommuter's job in their performance: examining job complexity, problem solving, interdependence, and social support. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34, 55-69.
Guenther, P., Guenther, M., Ringle, C. M., Zaefarian, G., & Cartwright, S. (2023). ImprovingPLS-SEM use for business marketing research. Industrial Marketing Management, 111, 127-142.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise multivariada de dados. 6a ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman Editora.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
Hershcovis, M. S. (2011). "Incivility, social undermining, bullying… oh my!": a call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(3), 499-519.
Irum, A., Ghosh, K., & Pandey, A. (2020). Workplace incivility and knowledge hiding: a research agenda. Benchmarking, 27(3), 958-980.
Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C., & Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: the role of core evaluations. Journal of applied psychology, 83(1), 17-34.
Ko, W. H., & Kang, H. Y. (2019). Effect of leadership style and organizational climate on employees' food safety and hygiene behaviors in the institutional food service of schools. Food Science & Nutrition, 7(6), 2131-2143.
Kramer, A., & Kramer, K. Z. (2020). The potential impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119, 1-4.
Kuenzi, M., Mayer, D. M., & Greenbaum, R. L. (2020). Creating an ethical organizational environment: The relationship between ethical leadership, ethical organizational climate, and unethical behavior. Personnel Psychology, 73(1), 43-71.
Kunkel, D., Carnevale, J., & Henderson, D. (2015). Examining instrument issues in workplace incivility: measurement or mutation? Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 19(1), 102-117.
Liu, C. E., Chen, Y., He, W., & Huang, J. (2019). Supervisor incivility and millennial employee creativity: A moderated mediation model. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 47(9), 1-11.
Neirotti, P., Raguseo, E., & Gastaldi, L. (2019). Designing flexible work practices for job satisfaction: the relation between job characteristics and work disaggregation in different types of work arrangements. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34(2), 116-138.
Ohly, S., & Fritz, C. (2010). Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: a multilevel study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 543–565.
Oore, D. G., Leblanc, D., Day, A., Leiter, M. P., Spence Laschinger, H. K., Price, S. L., & Latimer, M. (2010). When respect deteriorates: incivility as a moderator of the stressor–strain relationship among hospital workers. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(8), 878-888.
Park, S., & Cho, Y. J. (2020). Does telework status affect the behavior and perception of supervisors? Examining task behavior and perception in the telework context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1-26.
Prasad, K. D. V., Mangipudi, M. R., Vaidya, R., & Murulidhar, B. (2020). Organizational climate, opportunities, challanges and psychological wellbeing of remote working employees during COVID-19 pandemic: a general linear model approach with reference to information technology industry in Hyderabad. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 11(4), 372-389.
Raišienė, A. G., Rapuano, V., Varkulevičiūtė, K., & Stachová, K. (2020). Working from home - who is happy? A survey of Lithuania's employees during the Covid-19 quarantine period. Sustainability, 12(13), 1-21.
Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Sinkovics, N., & Sinkovics, R.R. (2023). A perspective on using partial least squares equation modelling in data articles. Data in Brief, 48, 109074.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. Journal of Service Science and Management, 10(3).
Rudolph, C. W., Rauvola, R. S., & Zacher, H. (2018). Leadership and generations at work: A critical review. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 44-57.
Santos, E. R. P., Lambarine, P. P. A., & Moreira, J. R. (2014). Teletrabalho: o futuro presente nas empresas de tecnologia da informação e comunicação. Negócios em Projeção, 5(2), 35-49.
Schilpzand, P., Pater, I. E., & Erez, A. (2016). Workplace incivility: a review of the literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, S57-S88.
Sims, C., Carter, A., & Moore De Peralta, A. (2020). Do servant, transformational, transactional, and passive avoidant leadership styles influence mentoring competencies for faculty? A study of a gender equity leadership development program. Human Resource Development Quarterly, , 1–21.
Spurk, D & Straub, C. (2020). Flexible employment relationships and careers in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 119, 1-14.
Tintoré, M. (2019). Introducing a Model of Transformational Prosocial Leadership. Journal of Leadership Studies, 13(3), 15-34.
Torkelson, E., Holm, K., Bäckström, M., & Schad, E. (2016). Factors contributing to the perpetration of workplace incivility: the importance of organizational aspects and experiencing incivility from others. Work & Stress, 30(2), 115-131.
Van Vianen, A. E. (2018). Person–environment fit: a review of its basic tenets. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 75-101.
Vieira, V. A. (2009). Moderação, mediação, moderadora-mediadora e efeitos indiretos em modelagem de equações estruturais: uma aplicação no modelo de desconfirmação de expectativas. Revista de Administração da Universidade de São Paulo, 44(1), 17-33
Welbourne, J. L., Gangadharan, A., & Sariol, A. M. (2015). Ethnicity and cultural values as predictors of the occurrence and impact of experienced workplace incivility. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(2), 205-217.
Wojcak, E., Bajzikova, L., Sajgalikova, H., & Polakova, M. (2016). How to achieve sustainable efficiency with teleworkers: leadership model in telework. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 229, 33-41.
Esta obra está licenciada sob uma licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.